Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

 
Learn about horrendous crimes, unscrupulous criminals, and corrupt politicians and lawyers who control the legal profession in Australia. Shameful, hideous, and treacherous are just a few words that describe these lawbreakers.
Fraudulent Reporting: My letter to the current prime minister of Australia Anthony Albanese in July 2023, pleads with him not to grant the Australian Communications Media Authority (Open letter to Prime Minister (Recovered) with the extra
powers the government wants to provide this government funded organisation. I was able to show in that letter after viewing this website absentjustice.com it would be a grave mistake to award ACMA these extra powers. The government wanted to give these public extra powers with the aim to prevent deceptive news reporting and the spread of false information, as well as misleading journalism practices.

 

Renaming AUSTEL as ACMA is akin to attempting to erase a leopard's spots and hoping it will forget its natural instincts. Despite the new name, the organization operated like a predator, producing biased reports for the minister and concealing the truth about Telstra's failing network during arbitration.

ACMA Australian Government

Click here to recommend this to your friends

Click here to Print or View this Media Release in PDF

Australian Citizens Party

Media Release Tuesday, 1 October 2024

Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 1800 636 432
Email: info@citizensparty.org.au
Website: https://citizensparty.org.au

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks

This is relevant to this bill because the entire official narrative of concern about mis- and disinformation has its origins not in claims made during the COVID pandemic starting in 2021, but in claims made during the 2016 US Presidential election regarding Julian Assange and WikiLeaks exposing embarrassing foreign policy and war secrets.

WikiLeaks has a reputation for 100 per cent accuracy, because it publishes leaked documents, not opinion. In 2016, WikiLeaks published leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta, which included, for instance, that in 2014 Clinton knew America’s ally and partner in the “war on terror” Saudi Arabia was funding the terrorist monsters ISIS then rampaging across Iraq and Syria. The Clinton campaign wouldn’t confirm or deny the emails, but claimed WikiLeaks was connected to an alleged “sophisticated Russian misinformation campaign”.

This grew into the narrative that Russia “hacked”, and otherwise influenced the US election, and that Assange and WikiLeaks were agents of Russia’s foreign interference campaign, which Assange denied and which two subsequent inquiries found no evidence for. But Assange had to be stopped: in April 2017, CIA Director Mike Pompeo—a fanatical warmonger infamous for boasting of the CIA “we lied, we cheated, we stole”—used this narrative to declare WikiLeaks a hostile intelligence agency aided by Russia, and in 2019 the Trump administration indicted Assange under the Espionage Act and sought his extradition from the United Kingdom, leading to him spending nearly four years in prison.

While the Morrison-Dutton government supported the US government’s persecution of Assange, majority Australian and world opinion now recognises that Assange was unjustly persecuted, and celebrates his freedom; however, the travesty he endured stemmed from the weaponisation of discredited claims of foreign disinformation, which has grown into a major international agenda that motivates this bill, evidenced in Section 13 and Section 44c.

Contact Absent Justice
Absent Justice Ebook

Read Alan’s new book
‘Absent Justice’

My decision to write this book stems from the complex nature of our narrative and the wide range of exhibits that required careful organization and duplication. This strategic choice allows readers to recognize the various crimes committed against the COT Cases by numerous entities, including public officials and regulatory agencies. This storytelling approach is essential in illustrating the extensive criminality that thrived within the government-sanctioned arbitrations under the International Arbitration Act.

Until the late 1990s, the Australian government-owned Australia's telephone network and the communications carrier Telecom (now privatized and known as Telstra). Telecom monopolised communications and allowed the network to fall into disrepair. Instead of addressing our severely deficient telephone services as part of the government-endorsed arbitration process—which became an uneven battle we could never win—these issues were never resolved, despite the hundreds of thousands of dollars it cost claimants to pursue their cases against this government-owned asset.

Quote Icon

“…your persistence to bring about improvements to Telecom’s country services. I regret that it was at such a high personal cost.”

The Hon David Hawker MP

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

“Only I know from personal experience that your story is true, otherwise I would find it difficult to believe. I was amazed and impressed with the thorough, detailed work you have done in your efforts to find justice”

Sister Burke

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

“I am writing in reference to your article in last Friday’s Herald-Sun (2nd April 1993) about phone difficulties experienced by businesses.

I wish to confirm that I have had problems trying to contact Cape Bridgewater Holiday Camp over the past 2 years.

I also experienced problems while trying to organise our family camp for September this year. On numerous occasions I have rung from both this business number 053 424 675 and also my home number and received no response – a dead line.

I rang around the end of February (1993) and twice was subjected to a piercing noise similar to a fax. I reported this incident to Telstra who got the same noise when testing.”

Cathy Lindsey

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us