Menu
My Bag

Your bag is currently empty.

Menu

Reading either my first published book, "Absent Justice," → Order Now - It's Free or my non-published chronology of events titled "My Story Warts and all," and you feel you would like to donate as an acknowledgement to the amount of time that has been put into this story to highlight the truth surrounding how some arbitrations are conducted in Australia, then please send it directly to Transparency International Australia.

Reading my two stories may captivate you to discuss this narrative, share it with your friends, and even write to the Australian government, urging them to delve into my story. Simply sending a letter to the Prime Minister of Australia detailing what you've read would demonstrate more truth in my story than what his government advisors are presenting. 

Attached is the letter I sent to Australia's Prime Minister, The Hon. Anthony Albanese, in July 2023, emphasizing how AUSTEL, the government communications authority (now called ACMA), should not be granted additional powers - An open letter to the Prime Minister (Recovered). Upon reading this attached letter, my two manuscripts, and Evidence Files, which substantiate the content of both manuscripts and my July 3, 2023 letter to Australia's Prime Minister, it may prompt visitors to absentjustice.com to share their thoughts.

Has there been a significant cover-up—a mistake made by two Telstra technical consultants who inadvertently left an open briefcase at my business's premises? The content of this briefcase is attributed to a small group of individuals known as the Casualties of Telstra, who had been experiencing telephone problems that had affected their small businesses for six years or up to a decade or more. These telephone faults had detrimental consequences that affected their lives and, in most cases, the lives of their families.

 

The story unfolds 

Absent Justice - My Story - The Briefcase Affair

 

This briefcase proves that Telstra senior management mislead and deceived me during my 11 December 1992 assessment process.  

 

The Australian government owned Australia's telephone network and the communications carrier, Telecom, until the late 1990s. Telecom, now privatized and called Telstra, monopolised communications and allowed the network to deteriorate into disrepair. Despite government-endorsed arbitration, our deficient telephone services were not fixed, resulting in an uneven battle that cost claimants hundreds of thousands of dollars to mount their claims against Telstra. Crimes were committed against us, our integrity was attacked and undermined, and our livelihoods were ruined. We lost millions of dollars, and our mental health declined. Shockingly, those who perpetrated the crimes still hold positions of power today, and the truth of our story is actively being covered up.

Click on Blowing The Whistle to uncover our original May 2021 Home Page, or go directly to LEARN MORE 

Who We Are

How can one effectively narrate a compelling story that prompts the author to question its authenticity, leading to a thorough review of records before proceeding? Additionally, how can one assertively address that the defendants in an arbitration process (the former government telecommunications carrier) intercepted documents faxed from your office without your knowledge or consent before redirecting them to their original destination after scrutiny? The defendants (the Telstra Corporation) screened these faxed documents to bolster their arbitration defence at the expense of the claimant's claim

The fax imprint across the top of this letter dated 12 May 1995 (Open Letter File No 55-A) is the same as the fax imprint described in the 7 January 1999 Scandrett & Associates report provided to Senator Ron Boswell (see Open Letter File No/12 and File No/13), confirming faxes were intercepted during the COT arbitrations. One of the two technical consultants attesting to the validity of this January 1999 fax interception report emailed me on 17 December 2014, stating:

“I still stand by my statutory declaration that I was able to identify that the incoming faxes provided to me for review had at some stage been received by a secondary fax machine and then retransmitted, this was done by identifying the dual time stamps on the faxes provided.” (Front Page Part One File No/14)

The government is obligated to transparently disclose the report mentioned above and publicly acknowledge that the interception of claimants' arbitration-related documents during the arbitration process constituted a violation of due process of law. This acknowledgement is pivotal as it will afford claimants the opportunity to contest their awards, notwithstanding the potential statutory limitations that would have otherwise hindered such recourse in the absence of governmental intervention.

Learn More ⟶  

Absent Justice - Phone HackingWho We Are
Absent Justice Ebook

Read Alan’s new book
‘Absent Justice’

The book "Absent Justice" delves into the widespread corruption within the government bureaucracy that tainted the Casualties of Telstra (COT) government-endorsed arbitrations. It exposes the individuals responsible for the serious wrongdoings committed by the arbitrator and the defendants who took part in these arbitrations. It also sheds light on their positions within Australia’s establishment during these illegal acts and the legal system that allowed these injustices to remain unresolved.

This deceitful behaviour is a form of betrayal, reminiscent of a Judas kiss involving secret dealings and betrayal. Such conduct, marked by dishonesty and deceit, fosters a corrupt environment and is tantamount to, if not worse than, double-dealing and deceiving those who trust the government. It represents pure malevolence.

When individuals misuse the law or legal threats to coerce and intimidate others, it leads to legal abuse or bullying. This type of dishonest behaviour often originates from public officials in Australia. (refer to https://shorturl.at/c6BgN).

Order Now - It's Free

Click on the image to the left of the page and see for yourself - this book conclusively proves our story. 

Read About Our Dealings With

Learn More ⟶

Quote Icon

“…the very large number of persons that had been forced into an arbitration process and have been obliged to settle as a result of the sheer weight that Telstra has brought to bear on them as a consequence where they have faced financial ruin if they did not settle…”

Senator Carr

 

Blowing the whistle 

Absent Justice - Hon Malcolm Fraser

While amid my arbitration case against the Telstra Corporation, I stumbled upon a freedom of information release by Telstra. The release disclosed that Telstra had documented and redacted my phone conversations with former Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Fraser (Senate Evidence File No/53). During those phone conversations, I expressed my concerns that Australia was providing wheat to China in 1967 despite being aware that China was redirecting it to North Vietnam. I'm curious to know how the interception of my telephone conversations during the arbitration proceedings in 1993 and 1994 with Malcolm Fraser is related to my exposure to the government on 18 September 1967 when Australia was trading with the enemy.

What intrigues me is the reason behind documenting a seemingly harmless conversation about Australia's wheat selling to China while being aware that China was supplying wheat to North Vietnam during a conflict with Australia, New Zealand and the United States. I am confident there must be a significant motive behind this, and I am determined to uncover it.

It's difficult to fathom the extent of harm inflicted on the young Australian, New Zealand, and United States service members by North Vietnam soldiers who were fueled by the wheat supplied to them by their communist Chinese supporters. Sadly, many of these brave service people lost their lives or were left with permanent injuries.

1.     In September of 1967, I brought to the attention of the Australian government that a portion of the wheat allocated to the People's Republic of China on humanitarian grounds was being redirected to North Vietnam during the Vietnam War Chapter 7- Vietnam - Vietcong

2.    Who else in the Australian government was aware that Australian wheat intended for a starving communist China was being redirected to North Vietnam to feed the North Vietnamese soldiers before those soldiers marched into the jungles of North Vietnam to kill and maim Australian, New Zealand, and United States of America troops? Refer to Footnote 82 to 85 FOOD AND TRADE IN LATE MAOIST CHINA,1960-1978, prepared by Tianxiao Zhu, who even reports the name of our ship, the Hopepeak and how the seaman feared for our lives if we were forced to return to China with another cargo of Australian wheat. Australian wheat was being redeployed to North Vietnam during the period when Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America fought the Vietnam Cong in the jungles of North Vietnam.   

3.   During the 1960s, the Australian Liberal-Country Party Government engaged in misleading conduct regarding trade with Communist China despite being cognizant of the fact that Australian merchant seamen had vehemently refused to transport Australian wheat to China. The grounds for such an objection were their apprehension that the wheat would be redirected to North Vietnam during the North Vietnam War between Australia, New Zealandand the United States of America. The underlying inquiry is to ascertain the government's rationale for deliberately deceiving the general public and jeopardising the country's troops whose lives were being lost in the conflict in North Vietnam.  Murdered for Mao: The killings China 'forgot'

4.    Why didn't Australia's Trade Minister, John McEwen, correctly and honestly advise the people of Australia why the crew of the British ship Hopepeak had refused to take any more Australian wheat to China because they had witnessed its redeployment to North Vietnam during their first visit to China?  

Were you denied justice in arbitration?

Would you like your story told on absentjustice.com?
 Contact Us