Welcome
Read about our dealings with fraudulent submission of corrupt evidence. Threats, misleading, and deceptive conduct used by government bureaucrats should not be tolerated in any country, let alone Australia. Selling out the other side of politics, the money grubbers and career dogs, especially politicians — who have compromised their morals and the community's needs in pursuit of illicit personal gain is shaping the Australian legal profession. Still, no one in the Australian government wants to investigate my evidence - Read about our dealings with.
Instances of foreign bribery, foreign corrupt practices, kleptocracy, foreign corruption programs, and international fraud against the government present significant challenges. Regrettably, the corruption of federal public officials is prevalent, posing a threat to the integrity of our governmental bodies. The events surrounding the Australian government-endorsed Casualties of Telstra arbitrations prompt reflection. The conduct of specific public figures, notably politicians, who prioritize personal gain over ethical considerations and community welfare, exerts a discernible influence on the Australian arbitration and mediation system - Contact - Government Corruption.
The Arbitrator
Dr Gordon Hughes, Warwick Smith - Order of Australia
Until the late 1990s, the Australian government owned Australia's telephone network and the communications carrier, Telecom (today privatised and called Telstra). Telecom held the monopoly on communications and let the network deteriorate into disrepair. When four small business owners had severe communication problems (I was the founding member of the four), they were offered a commercial assessment process by the Federal government, which endorsed the process. The arbitrations were a sham: the appointed arbitrator not only allowed Telstra to minimise tclaimant'st's claims and losses, but the arbitrator also bowed down to Telstra and let the carrier run the arbitrations. Telstra committed serious crimes during the arbitrations, yet, up to this day, the Australian government and the Australian Federal Police have been unable to hold Telstra, or the other entities involved in these crimes, accountable.
Evidence Files Corruption in Arbitration
The following text refers to 10 links, which have been extracted from 180 similar links that are appended to this website. Upon clicking on any of these links, it becomes unequivocally apparent that the COT arbitrations were plagued with pervasive corruption, deception, and misleading conduct, including the perversion of the course of justice. The evidence presented in these links indicates a systemic and deliberate effort to subvert the arbitration process and undermine the integrity of justice.
-
Bribery and Corruption My Story Warts & All. Delve into 'My Story, Warts and All', a candid chapter in Absent Justice Book 2, offering an unvarnished look at complex justice issues.
-
Chapter 2 - Freehill Hollingdale & Page, AUSTEL and Telstra. Chapter 2 in Absent Justice's series delves into the roles of Freehill Hollingdale, Page, Austel, and Telstra in key consumer affairs, unveiling c…
-
Absent Justice Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. Explore the comprehensive journey of Absent Justice across Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 within the context of Australian Federal Police Investigations.
-
Introduction to Absent Justice, Parts 1, 2, and 3. In Parts 1, 2, and 3, you will be introduced to the comprehensive exploration of absent justice within the context of Australian Federal Police Investigations.
-
Chapter 1 Irregular and untrustworthy. Begin the journey with Chapter 1, uncovering irregularities and untrustworthy actions in the context of tampering with evidence, setting the stage for…
-
Bad bureaucrats and the establishment. Taking on the Establishment: Bad Bureaucrats and the Establishment, as explored by Absent Justice.
-
Chapter 5—Who benefited from exonerating FHCA, DMR, and Special Counsel? Explore Chapter 5 of Consumer Affairs in Australian Federal Police Investigations. Discover who benefited from exonerating FHCA, DMR, and Special Counsel…
-
Chapter 2 - Inaccurate and Incomplete. Government corruption and horrendous and horrifying crimes were committed against ordinary small business operators by the Telstra Corporation, Australia…
-
Chapter 4: Distorted and unlawful. Dive into Chapter 4 of our exposé on public office misconduct, which reveals the alarming reality of evidence tampering in the justice system.
-
Chapter 1 concealment and forged evidence. AFP Investigations Chapter 1: Delve into the world of concealment and forged evidence. Join Absent Justice in uncovering the truth.
TIO Evidence File No 3-A is an internal Telstra email (FOI folio A05993) dated 10 November 1993 from Chris Vonwiller to Telstra’s corporate secretary Jim Holmes, CEO Frank Blount, group general manager of commercial Ian Campbell and other important members of the then-government owned corporation. The subject is Warwick Smith – COT cases, and it is marked as CONFIDENTIAL:
Exhibit TIO Evidence File No 3-A confirms that two weeks before the TIO was officially appointed as the administrator of the Fast Track Settlement Proposal FTSP, which became the Fast-Track Arbitration Procedure (FTAP, he was providing the soon-to-be defendants (Telstra) of that process with privileged, government party room information about the COT cases. Not only did the TIO (the administrator of the COT arbitrations) breach his duty of care to the COT claimants, he compromised his own future position as the official independent administrator of the process.
It is highly likely the advice Warwick Smith gave to Telstra’s senior executive, in confidence (that Senator Ron Boswell’s National Party Room was not keen on holding a Senate enquiry), later prompted Telstra to have the FTSP non-legalistic commercial assessment process turned into Telstra’s preferred legalistic arbitration procedure, because they now had inside government privileged information: there was no longer a major threat of a Senate enquiry.
